Selection for qacA carriage in CC22 but not CC30 MRSA bloodstream infection isolates during a successful institutional infection control programme.

Thursday, 3 January, 2013
  • Otter JA,
  • Patel A,
  • Cliff PR,
  • Halligan EP,
  • Tosas O


OBJECTIVES: The increasing use of chlorhexidine for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) decolonization raises concerns about reduced susceptibility. We evaluated the carriage of chlorhexidine resistance genes and chlorhexidine susceptibility in MRSA before and after introduction of an institutional MRSA control programme incorporating chlorhexidine-based decolonization in 2004.

METHODS: MRSA bloodstream infection (BSI) isolates identified between 2001 and 2009 were tested for spa and staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type and carriage of qacA, qacB and smr. Selected isolates were tested for chlorhexidine susceptibility. Logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between clone type, carriage of resistance genes and chlorhexidine susceptibility. Temporal trends in qacA or smr carriage were analysed using separate binomial generalized linear models.

RESULTS: Typing identified two dominant clones: CC22 (n = 224) and CC30 (n = 197). Annual MRSA BSI rates declined from 2004, although the rate of decline for CC22 was slower than for CC30. Carriage of qacA and smr and having a chlorhexidine MIC ≥2 mg/L did not increase overall amongst MRSA BSI isolates; however, qacA carriage increased in CC22 compared with in CC30 (OR, 7.21; 95% CI, 1.32-39.17). Furthermore, qacA+ CC22 isolates were more likely to have a chlorhexidine MIC ≥2 mg/L than qacA+ CC30 isolates (OR, 21.67; CI, 2.54-185.20).

CONCLUSIONS: A successful infection control programme was associated with the selection of qacA linked with a higher chlorhexidine MIC in one dominant endemic MRSA clone (CC22), but not another (CC30). The slower reduction in the CC22 MRSA BSI rate suggests that carriage of qacA confers a selective advantage, with implications for the sustainability of decolonization practice.

Where can I read this paper?

Full article on Oxford Journal. Note: you will need the credentials or your institution to login or you can purchase access.

Published: 2013 May;68(5):992-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks500. Epub 2013 Jan 3.